FyleHub vs Custom FTP

FyleHub vs Custom FTP: Why the Total Cost Calculation Favors Replacing FTP

Custom FTP infrastructure feels β€œfree” because the costs are distributed and normalized over time. When you count IT maintenance, operational recovery, compliance risk, and staff time, the true cost of custom FTP is 3–5x the cost of FyleHub.

TLS 1.3 EncryptedAES-256 EncryptionImmutable Audit Trail90-Day ROI Payback
3–5xFTP True Cost vs Perceived Cost
15–20 hrsStaff Time/Week on FTP Ops
2–4 wksFyleHub Migration Time
90 daysTypical FyleHub ROI Payback
The Hidden Costs

The Hidden True Cost of Custom FTP Infrastructure

Most financial institutions undercount the cost of their FTP infrastructure because the costs are distributed across IT, operations, and compliance teams. When the full cost picture is assembled, custom FTP is rarely the economical choice it appears to be.

$50K–$150K/yr

IT Infrastructure Maintenance

FTP server hosting, patching, monitoring, and disaster recovery. Credential management for every counterparty connection. Script updates every time a custodian or vendor changes their data format. Security remediation when vulnerabilities are discovered in FTP server software.

$200K–$500K/yr

Operations Staff Time

15–20 hours per week of operations staff time monitoring FTP logs, manually downloading files, recovering from failed jobs, chasing missing files from counterparties, and reconciling data that arrived in unexpected formats. At $50–$150/hour loaded cost, this represents $200K–$500K annually in operations labor.

Unlimited exposure

Compliance and Regulatory Risk

Regulators increasingly require documented audit trails for every data transfer involving sensitive financial information. Plain FTP provides none. In an examination, unlogged FTP transfers are indefensible. A single regulatory finding related to FTP security can result in remediation costs that dwarf years of FyleHub subscription fees.

Quantifiable per incident

Data Error Correction

When FTP jobs fail silently and data errors propagate to downstream systems β€” portfolio management systems, reporting tools, compliance surveillance β€” the cost of finding and correcting the error includes staff time, system reconciliation, potential regulatory disclosure, and client communication.

Total annual cost of custom FTP infrastructure, fully counted: $300K–$700K. FyleHub annual cost: $50K–$200K depending on data volumes and connections. ROI payback: typically within 90 days.

Feature Comparison

FyleHub vs Custom FTP β€” Security, Operations, and Compliance

CapabilityFyleHubCustom FTP Infrastructure
Data encryption in transitTLS 1.3None (FTP) / Basic (SFTP/FTPS)
Data encryption at restAES-256None by default
Audit trail on every transferImmutable, completeNone / basic server logs
Access controls per userβœ“Limited / none
Automated format normalizationβœ“β€”
Error detection and alertingReal-timeSilent failures
IT maintenance overheadMinimal (platform managed)Significant (internal IT)
Real-time data availabilityAPI-drivenBatch/scheduled only
Regulatory audit capabilityOn demandNot available
Format change handlingConfiguration update, same dayIT engineering, weeks
Adding new counterpartyConfiguration, daysEngineering project, weeks
Honest Assessment

When Custom FTP Is Defensible

We are objective about this. There are limited scenarios where maintaining custom FTP infrastructure makes sense.

Truly isolated, non-critical data transfers

If a data transfer involves non-sensitive internal data between two systems you fully control, has no regulatory implications, and requires no audit trail, the overhead of migrating to a managed platform may not be justified.

Imminent counterparty migration to direct API

If a specific FTP connection is scheduled to be replaced by a direct API integration within the next 6 months, migrating it to FyleHub as an interim step may not deliver sufficient ROI.

Single-use legacy system decommission

If a legacy system that depends on FTP is being decommissioned within the next year, maintaining the FTP connection until decommission may be preferable to migrating it to a new platform.

For any other scenario β€” compliance-sensitive data, regulatory audit requirements, operational reliability needs, or multi-counterparty FTP infrastructure β€” FyleHub delivers clear, quantifiable ROI.

Migration Methodology

Migrating from Custom FTP to FyleHub

FyleHub's migration methodology maps your FTP pipelines, runs them in parallel with FyleHub, validates outputs, and decommissions legacy infrastructure β€” typically 2–4 weeks per pipeline.

01

FTP Pipeline Inventory

FyleHub's migration team maps all FTP pipelines β€” source, destination, frequency, format, counterparty. Each pipeline is categorized by compliance sensitivity, volume, and downstream dependency. A migration priority order is established.

02

Parallel Run Validation

FyleHub is configured to receive and process data alongside your existing FTP pipelines. Outputs are validated against FTP outputs for a set validation period. No cutover occurs until data quality is confirmed to match or exceed FTP.

03

Cutover and Decommission

After parallel validation, FyleHub handles the controlled cutover. FTP infrastructure is decommissioned pipeline-by-pipeline. Full audit trail and compliance documentation is active from the first day of FyleHub operations.

Client Outcome

FTP Migration Results

β€œWe had 14 FTP pipelines running to seven custodians and three fund administrators. The full-cost analysis showed we were spending $420K annually in IT and operations staff time on FTP management alone. FyleHub cost us $95K and took 6 weeks to migrate everything. The ROI paid back in under four months.”

β€” CFO, $5.5B Institutional Asset Manager

14 pipelines
FTP pipelines migrated to FyleHub
$325K/yr
Annual cost reduction after migration
< 4 months
Time to full ROI payback

FyleHub vs Custom FTP FAQ

QWhy should financial institutions replace custom FTP solutions?

Custom FTP solutions accumulate four categories of cost that are easy to undercount: IT maintenance burden (server patching, credential management, script updates when formats change), operational recovery time (manual intervention when jobs fail), compliance risk (no audit trails, no encryption guarantees, no access controls), and staff time on data wrangling. When these costs are fully counted, custom FTP is typically significantly more expensive than a managed platform like FyleHub.

QHow much does custom FTP infrastructure really cost annually?

The IT direct cost of maintaining FTP infrastructure is typically $50K–$150K annually in staff time. But the larger costs are indirect: operations staff spending 15–20 hours per week on manual data recovery and monitoring (representing $200K–$500K in annual labor cost), compliance risk remediation, and the cost of data errors that reach downstream systems. Most clients find total FTP operating costs of $300K–$700K annually when fully counted.

QWhat happens to all our existing counterparty FTP connections if we switch to FyleHub?

In most cases, counterparties do not need to change anything when you migrate to FyleHub. FyleHub acts as a secure intermediary β€” it can continue to receive data via SFTP from counterparties that deliver that way, while providing all the monitoring, validation, transformation, and distribution capabilities that FTP lacks. Your counterparties do not see any change; your internal operations see a completely different experience.

QWhat is the total cost of ownership comparison between FyleHub and custom FTP?

FyleHub's annual cost is typically $50K–$200K depending on data volumes and number of connections. Custom FTP total cost of ownership, including staff time, IT maintenance, compliance risk, and error recovery, is typically $300K–$700K annually. The ROI of switching to FyleHub is typically positive within 90 days.

QHow does FyleHub handle SFTP and FTPS β€” are those also covered?

Yes. FyleHub replaces SFTP and FTPS pipelines as well as plain FTP. While SFTP and FTPS add encryption, they share the core limitations of FTP β€” no audit trail, no real-time monitoring, no error handling automation, no transformation capabilities, and IT maintenance burden. FyleHub addresses all of these limitations while supporting SFTP as an input protocol during parallel run migration.

Ready to Switch?

Replace Your FTP Infrastructure β€” Starting This Quarter

FyleHub's migration team will map your FTP pipelines, run them in parallel with FyleHub, validate the output, and decommission the legacy infrastructure β€” in 2–4 weeks per pipeline.

Free migration assessment Β· Parallel run validation included Β· ROI within 90 days